Cite while you write problem

[leggova]

Has anyone ever seen this before (see below)? I have tried unconverting all citation and then updating but it doesn’t help.

i am using Endnote X7 and this is my PhD thesis which is around 100,000 words long.

Help!

Miranda

My text looks like this:

The Interpreter Voice is characterised by the inclusion of inscribed Social Esteem (Normality, Capacity and Tenacity) and Valuation, with little to no inscribed Social Sanction (Propriety and Veracity) (Coffin, 2004, p. 151). As such, these texts lack moral and ethical evaluations and are typical of Explaining genres (p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154).

On the other hand, the Adjudicator Voice is characterised by the inclusion of inscribed Social Esteem and Valuation like the texts with an Interpreter voice, but also includes inscribed Social Sanction (Coffin, 2004, p. 151). This inclusion of moral and ethical evaluations are typical of arguing texts (p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154).

Hood’s analysis of research article introductions (2012) also uses voice theory to explore how Appraisal patterns in introductions can be categorised into different voices, or as she calls them, evaluative keys. Hood identifies three different voices in the introductions (Hood, 2012, p. 61). The first one is the Observer Voice which focusing on appraising the object of study. The second is the Critic Voice which appraised the

[tmartin]

It is possible that your document has corrupt field codes in it. We have a FAQ on our web site that gives the steps to remove all of the field codes and clean up the document. You should first make a backup of your Word document and then follow the steps in the FAQ at: http://endnote.com/kb/81143What may happen is you will have one unformatted citation like {Jones, 1999 #34} and then several (p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154) after it once you do the above steps you will have to manually delete the (p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154)(p. 154) You should then be able to Update the Citations and Bibliography in the Word document and not have it duplicate the citations anymore. Let us know if you have any questions or if this does not resolve the issue.

[leggova]

Ok, I tried the process outlined in the link and it didn’t work. They are all still there. The first one is linked to a citation and the rest are just text. If I delete them manually and update the citations again after closing the file and opening them they come back. Not only that but it messed up my list of tables and figures.

Any other ideas?