Hi, Leanne.
Thank you so much, again. I can see that I have really thoroughly confused. Your attached images seem to be what I am looking for. If I am parsing what you say correctly (and I may not be), it seems as though you are suggesting using Chicago 16 footnote style, but actually citing the bibliography, not using CWYW in Word, but just using Word itself to put in endnotes, instead of footnotes. Is that correct? That is sort of the conclusion that I have been coming to. That I should just use EndNote for bibliography management, and forget about CWYW. I know that it is very easy to create endnotes in Word, and also to edit for superscript format, etc., etc. Maybe EndNote is really more of a bibliography management program than an in-text citation/footnote/endnote program?
Tomorrow I will copy a couple chapters where I have been thoroughly confused by the CWYW results, see if I can clean them up, and apply your suggestions. The way my settings are now (with Chicago, numbered), citation numbers are all screwy, as EndNote seems to apply the same number for any citation that uses the same bibliographic info, even if multiple in-text cites actualy are citing the same work with different page numbers. What used to be called Ibid or Op Cit in the old days.
Very indebted.
Fred