Mathilda,
thank you for your reply.
You are still side-stepping my question. You claim that your product Endnote Web, as provided, covers “frequent” use-cases of Chicago Style A. You further claim that my use case of an endnote-style bibliography with page ranges is not frequent and thus would require either the use of your Desktop product (and the inconveniences it entails) or the site-specific accommodations.
Please either retract those claims, or provide a single example of a published paper that is using Chicago A that can be created with Endnote Web as you provide it.
For what it’s worth, finding the counterexample whose DOI I provided didn’t require any effort on my part - it was the first journal paper using this style I encountered in a Google search.