I am somewhat use to using old Endnotes 6 (although I’ve forgotten half of what I knew) and recently upgraded to X-2 as I took up this dissertation again at the near drop dead deadline point. Even though the older Endnotes library was not supported for easy import into X-2, the traveling library from previous drafts (written in Word 2002) saved the day. Earlier papers were working fine and even new ones started on X-2 were OK. Traveling library files established a new Endnotes library on X-2 with fewer errors than direct transfer was creating. However now, the footnotes in my paper just suddenly changed. I do not know what I did. I may have altered something when I was changing some Word defaults. At the time I noted the change, I was editing some footnotes created in Word 2007. At that point I saw that my citation notes from Endnotes had all changed to near gibberish with all the information (hidden transportable library info?, separated by various delimiting symbols and codes, replacing the nicely formatted Turabian style footnotes. I can't seem to find out how to reset this back to normal. I have tried the help functions and searched the forum for FAQ to no avail. My header page numbering and bibliography are also affected on screen. Please help - I have a deadline that is urgent. I have "see page number" footnotes which are not yet number keyed to the edited pages and with this glitch it is impossible for me to determine what the real page numbers are unless I print out the full paper each time I make changes. Sometimes the error also occurs in the body of the text where a footnote reference number should appear, but not always. Here are some samples: Header: 1 – 09/07/2009 Pastes normally above, but appeared on the page as: {PAGE \*Arabic \*MEREGEFORMAT } – 09/07/2009 Footnote: Cut and pasted here – [1] Same as “Contemporary and seminal literature,” see definition on page 4X. [1]New King James Version, (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1982). (Matthew 28:19) On the page in Word 2007 it the second note (citation) looks like this: 11{ ADDIN EN.CITE1982 <492><492> And so forth for nine more lines of information and codes mixed just to produce the second(citation #11) of the two references copied and pasted above. Note: The pasted numbers should have appeared as 10 and 11 not both as bracketed number ones. I hope this gives you a clear idea of the problem and that it presents an easy fix to something I have forgotten or which I am overlooking. Thanks. Sincerely, Ken Morrison PS: It is typical to mix Word and Endnotes using one for notes and the other for citations? It seemed to be working for a couple of months at least.