I want the author field display only the last author in the library window. is there a way to do so? as you know, the last author is usually the coresponding author, at least in biomedical papers. I think it is more informative than the first author or just display all authors in the field.
problem 2
when I want to create a group in my library, I find that I need 2 steps. first search my library, drag what I want. Then search my online database, drag what I want. And I must let endnote automatically discard duplicate references when doing so.
No way I can think of. If corresponding authors were reliably identified in Pubmed or other databases, than Endnote might be able to extract the specific Author (but sometimes it is “authors”) and put it (but what if it were “them”?) in a separate field which you could then choose to display. Maybe it is buried somewhere, but a quick look at pubmed, didn’t reveal any annotation I could interprete as corresponding authors.Â
No. And to be very honest, I prefer to be able to distinguish papers based on their first authors. They deserve the credit due to them!Â
You can always do searches and create groups (and even smart groups in X2).Â
You can also try to leverage the subject bibliography, but this is of limited use, as it really only allows one to export a bibliography based on a specific author or other field.  It would be nice if one could select and display the records easily from subject bibliography list, and either convert to a smart group or edit them there, to globally fix inconsistencies, such as initials with and without full stops, etc. But these are conversations for suggestions I guess!
Most reliable way to register that with them is via the website. Putting it in the suggestions part of the forum might also help, generating “me too” responses in support.Â
I just noticed problem 2. What version of endnote are you using? X2 has smart groups which should update a group based on your search parameters, elimating the need to keep dragging. Â
Yes, duplicate handling in X2 was a step backwards. I always first bring general search results into a true “temporary” library and then import that temporary library into my main library and to be sure I don’t throw out a new reference with more information than the existing reference, I sometimes keep the duplicates by choosing to export them to the duplicates library. A bit tedious, but it keeps my library neater.Â
If duplicates do escape into my library, I do the duplicates search and make those into a group and then check them one by one, deleting the one I don’t want.
To create the “temporay library” I always let endnote create the new library with the default name and location, and tell it "yes, you can discard the references already in “MyEndnoteLibrary.enl”.Â
Yes, duplicate handling in X2 was a step backwards. I always first bring general search results into a true “temporary” library and then import that temporary library into my main library and to be sure I don’t throw out a new reference with more information than the existing reference, I sometimes keep the duplicates by choosing to export them to the duplicates library. A bit tedious, but it keeps my library neater.Â
If duplicates do escape into my library, I do the duplicates search and make those into a group and then check them one by one, deleting the one I don’t want.Â